<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><ArticleSet>
                    <Article>
            <Journal>
                <PublisherName>مؤسسه آموزشی و پژوهشی امام خمینی(ره)</PublisherName>
                <JournalTitle>تاریخ اسلام در آینه پژوهش</JournalTitle>
                <Issn>2423-4028</Issn>
                <Volume>2</Volume>
                <Issue>1</Issue>
                <PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
                    <Year>2005</Year>
                    <Month>04</Month>
                    <Day>30</Day>
                </PubDate>
            </Journal>
            <ArticleTitle></ArticleTitle>
            <VernacularTitle>درآمدى برشناخت شکل گیرى و تطور صحابه نگارى(2)</VernacularTitle>
            <FirstPage>225</FirstPage>
            <LastPage>250</LastPage>
            <ELocationID EIdType="pii">408</ELocationID>
            <ELocationID EIdType="doi"></ELocationID>
            <Language>FA</Language>
            <AuthorList>
                        <Author>
            <FirstName>محمدرضا</FirstName>
            <LastName>هدایت پناه</LastName>
            <Affiliation>دانشیار - پژوهشگاه حوزه و دانشگاه</Affiliation>
            <Identifier Source="ORCID">0009-0008-2451-6526</Identifier>
        </Author>
                    </AuthorList>
            <PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
            <History>
                <PubDate PubStatus="received">
                    <Year>2026</Year>
                    <Month>07</Month>
                    <Day>01</Day>
                </PubDate>
            </History>
            <Abstract>In our previous issue , we introduced to the readers the first part of this research which was a review of the development of the historiography of the Prophet&#039;s Companions in the period from the first century until the seventh century i.e. until the time of Ibn al-Athir and &quot;Kitab Asad al- Ghabah Fi Ma&#039;rifat al-Sahabah&quot; . The article takes a glance at some issues including the status of the Prophet&#039;s Companions, who represent a link between the age of the Muhammadian message and the later generations , the early development of historiography of the Prophet&#039;s Companions and a general bibliography of the early historiographers who wrote the Prophet&#039;s Companions. The discussion also included such issues like writing about the good qualities of the Companions , the histriography of the Companions according to locality and the origin and early development of two schools of historiography of the Companions; namely the hadith school and the narrative - critical school.

The author , then , points to the challenges which hadith school faced and how they caused the historiographers who wrote about the Companions to turn away from this school and join the narrative - critical school.

Meanwhile , an acount is introduced about the methods used in the writing of three important books including Abu Na&#039;im&#039;s `` Ma&#039;rifat al Sahabah&#039;&#039; and Ibn Abd al-Bir&#039;s `` Al- Isti&#039;ab Fi Ma&#039;rifat al As . hab&#039;&#039; . The rest of the research will appear in later issues.</Abstract>
            <OtherAbstract Language="FA">در بخش نخست، نگاهى گذرا به سیر تدوین صحابه نگارى از قرن نخست تا قرن هفتم، یعنى تا عصر ابن اثیر و کتاب اسدالغابه فى معرفة الصحابه داشتیم. مباحثى هر چند خلاصه درباره جایگاه صحابه نزد مسلمانان به عنوان واسطه میان عصر رسالت و نسل هاى بعدى و نیز شروع صحابه نگارى و فهرست صحابه نگاران پیشگام، بیان شد. هم چنین به فضایل نگارى صحابه و صحابه نگارى محلى و نیز دو مکتب صحابه نگارى حدیثى و توصیفى - انتقادى پرداختیم و اشاره شد که مکتب حدیث نگارى با کدام چالش ها روبه رو شد که صحابه نگاران بعدى از این رویه تبعیت نکرده، به صحابه نگارى توصیفى - انتقادى رو آوردند و در این میان به توضیح و تبیین شیوه و روش تدوین سه کتاب مهم معرفة الصحابه ابونعیم، معرفة الصحابه ابن مَنْده و الاستیعاب فى معرفة الاصحاب ابن عبدالبر پرداختیم. اینک ادامه بحث.</OtherAbstract>
            <ObjectList>
                            </ObjectList>
                    </Article>
    </ArticleSet>
