, Volume 2, Issue 4, No 8, Year 2025 , Pages 31-49

    Mani and Shapoor (A historical experience from eclectic pluralism)

    Article Type: 
    Promotional
    Writers:
    Fathullah Mojtabaei / History Professor at the universities in Iran.
    Gholam Reza Barahmand / Doctorate (Ph.D) student of history and a member of the science board of Azad university, Shahre Rey branch.
    Abstract: 
    In this essay, a valued scholar has investigated some important issues concerning the beginning of the Sassanid period. Primarily he analyses the causes of intimacy between the great Sassanid king, Shapoor the first, and the pretender of prophecy of his era, Mani. It was revealed that Shapoor intended to establish a global kingdom, while Mani had also endeavored to create a religion from some of the elements of the preceding religions, to replace them all and be approved as the single global religion. Therefore his religion was considered as the best alternative for Shapoor to attain his goals to conquer the world. Meanwhile, according to the author, Manichaeism was essentially a sect of Mazdaie, and accordingly he has against logics and reasoning, and comparing this report with the studies and the investigations done on the conquer of Egypt, we will discover that this function has not been accomplished by the Muslims and even if it has with a weak possibility, it shouldn't have happened in Iskandariah's first victory. Rather it happened in his second victory, and at the time of Uthmans'ruling. We precede this issue in this article by the above mentioned viewpoint.
    چکیده و کلیدواژه فارسی (Persian)
    Title :مــانى و شاپور / نویسنده: دکتر فتح الله مجتبایى / مترجم: غلامرضا برهمند
    Abstract: 
    در این مقاله، دانشمندى گرانمایه چند مسئله مهم مربوط به اوایل عصر ساسانى را بررسى کرده است: نخست، علل نزدیکى شاهنشاه بزرگ ساسانى شاپور اول، و مدعى پیامبرى عصر وى، مانى را به یکدیگر تجزیه و تحلیل نموده است. بر این مبنا، شاپور قصد ایجاد یک شاهنشاهى جهانى را داشته است، در حالى که مانى هم کوشیده بود ضمن اقتباس برخى از عناصر ادیان پیشین، دینى به وجود آورد که بتواند جاى تمامى آن ها را بگیرد و به عنوان دین واحد جهانى پذیرفته شود. بنابراین، دین او بهترین گزینه در راه نیل شاپور به اهداف جهانگیرانه اش به شمار آمد. در عین حال، بنابر نظر نویسنده، مانویت در اصل فرقه اى مزدایى بوده است و به همین سبب مانى را زندیک خوانده، زیرا اساس اندیشه وى بر زند یا تفسیر اوستا قرار داشته و یا به تفسیر تازه اى از اوستا قائل بوده است. و سرانجام، برخلاف نظر برخى محققان خارجى، مانویت اصولاً دینى ایرانى بوده و این نکته روشنى است که در ایران و جهان معاصر مانى به آن اذعان شده است.
    Cite this article: RIS Mendeley BibTeX APA MLA HARVARD VANCOUVER

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Mojtabaei, Fathullah, Barahmand, Gholam Reza.(2025) Mani and Shapoor (A historical experience from eclectic pluralism). , 2(4), 31-49

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Fathullah Mojtabaei; Gholam Reza Barahmand."Mani and Shapoor (A historical experience from eclectic pluralism)". , 2, 4, 2025, 31-49

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Mojtabaei, F, Barahmand, G.(2025) 'Mani and Shapoor (A historical experience from eclectic pluralism)', , 2(4), pp. 31-49

    APA | MLA | HARVARD | VANCOUVER

    Mojtabaei, F, Barahmand, G. Mani and Shapoor (A historical experience from eclectic pluralism). , 2025; 2(4): 31-49